Tuesday, August 25, 2020

Concept of God According to Descartes Essay Example

Idea of God According to Descartes Essay The idea of God as indicated by Descartes and the supposed antitheist position of Descartes Philomon Kani  â Rene Descartes is frequently credited with being the â€Å"Father of Modern Philosophy. † This title is legitimized due both to his break with the customary Scholastic-Aristotelian way of thinking common at his time and to his turn of events and advancement of the new, robotic sciences. His essential break with Scholastic way of thinking was twofold. To begin with, Descartes believed that the Scholastics’ strategy was inclined to question given their dependence on sensation as the hotspot for all information. Second, he needed to supplant their last causal model of logical clarification with the more present day, unthinking model. Descartes endeavored to address the previous issue by means of his technique for question. His fundamental system was to consider bogus any conviction that falls prey to even the smallest uncertainty. This â€Å"hyperbolic doubt† then serves to make room for what Descartes considers to be a fair-minded quest for reality. This freeing from his recently held convictions at that point puts him at an epistemological ground-zero. From here Descartes embarks to discover something that lies past all uncertainty. He in the end finds that â€Å"I exist† is difficult to question and is, in this way, sure beyond a shadow of a doubt. It is starting here that Descartes continues to show God’s presence and that God can't be a trickster. This, thus, serves to fix the assurance of everything that is unmistakably and particularly comprehended and gives the epistemological establishment Descartes set out to discover. Descartes was a realist rationalist. The realists needed to demonstrate everything by reason alone, on the grounds that they imagined that the faculties were inconsistent. The distinction between diagnostic articulations or engineered proclamations was not yet clear at that point. We will compose a custom article test on Concept of God According to Descartes explicitly for you for just $16.38 $13.9/page Request now We will compose a custom exposition test on Concept of God According to Descartes explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer We will compose a custom exposition test on Concept of God According to Descartes explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer We believe that God exists must be demonstrated by utilizing the two faculties and reason, however Descartes demonstrated the presence of God with reason alone. At the start of the Third Meditation, Descartes attempted to utilize this first truth as the worldview for his general record of the opportunities for accomplishing human information. In the cogito, familiarity with myself, of speculation, and of presence are by one way or another consolidated so as to bring about an instinctive handle of a reality that can't be questioned. Maybe we can discover in different cases similar justification for apparent truth. In any case, what's going on here? The appropriate response lies in Descartess hypothesis of thoughts. Considered officially, as the substance of my reasoning movement, the thoughts associated with the cogito are curiously clear and particular. (Medications. III) But thoughts may likewise be considered impartially, as the psychological delegates of things that truly exist. As per an agent pragmatist like Descartes, at that point, the associations among our thoughts yield truth just when they compare to the manner in which the world truly is. Be that as it may, it isn't evident that our unmistakable and particular thoughts do relate to the truth of things, since we guess that there might be a supreme liar. In some measure, the unwavering quality of our thoughts may rely upon the source from which they are determined. Descartes held that there are just three prospects: the entirety of our thoughts are either unusual (entering the psyche from the outside world) or factitious (produced by the brain itself) or natural (engraved on the psyche by God). (Drug. III) But I dont yet realize that there is an outside world, and I can envision nearly anything, so everything relies upon whether God exists and bamboozles me. The following stage in the quest for information, at that point, is to demonstrate that God does without a doubt exist. Descartess beginning stage for such a proof is the rule that the reason for any thought must have at any rate as much reality as the substance of the thought itself. In any case, since my concept of God has a totally boundless substance, the reason for this thought must itself be interminable, and just the really existing God is that. At the end of the day, my concept of God can't be either extrinsic or factitious (since I could neither experience God legitimately nor find the idea of flawlessness in myself), so it must be intrinsically given by God. In this way, God exists. (Drug. III) As a reinforcement to this contention, Descartes offered a customary form of the cosmological contention for Gods presence. From the cogito I realize that I exist, and since I am not immaculate all around, I can't have caused myself. So something different more likely than not caused my reality, and regardless of what that something is (my folks? ), we could ask what made it exist. The chain of causes must end inevitably, and that will be with a definitive, great, self-caused being, or God. As Antoine Arnauld brought up in an Objection distributed alongside the Meditations themselves, there is an issue with this thinking. Since Descartes will utilize the presence (and veracity) of God to demonstrate the dependability of clear and unmistakable thoughts in Meditation Four, his utilization of clear and particular plans to demonstrate the presence of God in Meditation Three is a case of round thinking. Descartes answered that his contention isn't roundabout on the grounds that instinctive thinking in the confirmation of God as in the cogitoâ€requires no further help at the time of its origination. We should depend on a non-misdirecting God just as the underwriter of veridical memory, when an illustrative contention includes such a large number of steps to be held in the psyche without a moment's delay. However, this reaction isn't completely persuading. The issue is a huge one, since the evidence of Gods presence isn't just the primary endeavor to build up the truth of something outside oneself yet in addition the establishment for each further endeavor to do as such. On the off chance that this evidence falls flat, at that point Descartess seeks after human information are seriously shortened, and we are stuck in solipsism, incapable to be totally sure of anything over our own reality as a reasoning thing. In light of this booking, admirably proceed through the Meditations, perceiving how Descartes attempted to destroy his own purposes behind uncertainty. The confirmation of Gods presence really makes the theoretical uncertainty of the First Meditation somewhat more regrettable: I presently realize that there truly is a being incredible enough to bamboozle me every step of the way. In any case, Descartes contended that since all culminations normally go together, and since misleading is constantly the result of flaw, it follows that the really transcendent being has no explanation or thought process in double dealing. God doesn't bamboozle, and uncertainty of the most profound sort might be surrendered for eternity. (Prescription. IV) It follows that the basic natures and the realities of arithmetic are currently secure. Actually, Descartes kept up, I would now be able to live in immaculate certainty that my scholarly resources, presented on me by a veracious God, are appropriately intended for the trepidation of truth. In any case, this appears to suggest excessively: on the off chance that I have a supernaturally enriched limit with respect to finding reality, at that point why dont I generally accomplish it? The issue isn't that I need information on certain things; that lone implies that I am constrained. Or maybe, the inquiry is the reason I so regularly commit errors, accepting what is bogus regardless of my ownership of undeniable mental capacities. Descartess answer gets from an examination of the idea of human cognizance for the most part. Each psychological demonstration of judgment, Descartes held, is the result of two unmistakable resources: the understanding, which only watches or sees, and the will, which consents to the confidence being referred to. Considered independently, the comprehension (albeit restricted in scope) is satisfactory for human needs, since it understands totally everything for which it has clear and particular thoughts. Additionally, the will as an autonomous staff is great, since it (like the desire of God) is totally free in each regard. Accordingly, God has kindly furnished me with two resources, neither of which is intended to deliver blunder rather than genuine conviction. However I do commit errors, by abusing my choice to consent on events for which my comprehension doesn't have clear and unmistakable thoughts. (Medications. IV) For Descartes, mistake is essentially an ethical coming up short, the hardheaded exercise of my forces of having faith in overabundance of my capacity to see reality. To place it in straightforward term this is the manner by which Descartes verification about the presence of God unfurls: 1. I exist (Axiom). 2. I have in my brain the thought of an ideal being (Axiom, mostly dependent on 1) 3. A blemished being, such as myself, can't concoct the thought of an ideal being (Axiom) 4. In this way the thought of an ideal being more likely than not began from the ideal acting naturally (from 2 3)â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â 5. An ideal being would not be great on the off chance that it didn't exist (Axiom) 6. In this manner an ideal being must exist (from 4 5) Descartes verification about the presence of God has been reprimanded by numerous individuals for its straightforwardness and in light of the fact that not every person has the possibility of God in his brain. Indeed, even a few Christians come up short on the possibility of God. Descartes despite everything protected his remain on the presence of God. In any case, the most clever of everything to happen is the judgment of Descartes work by the then Catholic Church. One can credit the judgment to his break from the conventionalist educational Aristotelian way of thinking yet the broadly acknowledged explanation behind his judgment as indicated by C. F. Fowler is that Descartes in his reflection has neglected to demonstrate the everlasting status of the Soul. Descartes contends that psyche and body are extremely unmistakable in two places in the Sixth Meditation. The first argumen

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Why Freelance Writers Need an Evergreen Stable of Writing

Why Freelance Writers Need an Evergreen Stable of Writing Why Freelance Writers Need an Evergreen Stable of Writing Why Freelance Writers Need an Evergreen Stable of Writing By Guest Author This is a visitor post by Jennifer Moline. In the event that you need to compose for Daily Writing Tips check the rules here. Frequently in the composing scene it pays to be on recent developments †to be the first to distribute breaking news. However, so as to land an agreement or customary gig, consultants ought to consider keeping a reserve of evergreen articles †those ageless composing pieces that remain all alone. â€Å"Evergreen† takes its importance from the evergreen tree †a self-restoring article, for this situation. It implies that the composing piece doesn’t have a period limit †a distributer could run it in July or December. These are acceptable articles to have close by for an assortment of reasons: You have such a large number of cutoff times. On the off chance that your task theme is ambiguous, you can pull out an evergreen article and modify it for the intended interest group. You need more portfolio pieces. In the event that you’re simply beginning as an essayist, you might not have a ton of distributed articles. Evergreen articles show your range and hamburger up your portfolio. Your article failed to work out. It’s happened to each essayist †you’re on cutoff time, and a source isn’t coming through with a meeting. As opposed to miss the cutoff time, which would think about ineffectively your notoriety, offer an evergreen article as a substitution. Building up a store of evergreen articles accomplishes require additional work, however an approach to see it is this: You get the opportunity to break liberated from assignments and expound on what you need to. You can concoct your own subjects and write in your style. Building your evergreen reserve could really be the inventive outlet your expert vocation needs †you get the opportunity to break free of writers’ rules and let your own style stream. So what would it be a good idea for you to expound on? It relies upon what you’re inspired by and what fields you need to break into. Be that as it may, the most ideal approach to begin is with a writer’s most important devices: paper and pen. Keep a scratch pad with you consistently and write down whatever moves you. I keep an archive with blog thoughts, regardless of whether I can think about an appropriate site for them or not. I allude to it on for all intents and purposes an everyday schedule to check whether I can tissue out a thought more or suitable the subject for a particular site. You can discover composing motivation in a wide range of spots. When you’re perusing, what flies into your head †do you can't help contradicting the point the author makes? Compose your own sentiment piece. Does an article leave you with questions? Research and compose your own augmentation. Removing a stage from perusing likewise frees you up to being struck by motivation. Now and again it’s how a film causes you to feel or an experience in a cafã ©. Try to getting mindful of what arouses your curiosity †on the off chance that you feel a theme merits investigating, your potential crowd should. Independent composing can be a vicious business †it’s each individual for his-or herself clamoring for composing gigs. You sell yourself dependent on your work tests and what you can offer, so an evergreen stable of articles is your opportunity to advance your composition on points you believe should have been composed. About the Author: Jennifer Moline expounds on private company, visual computerization, printing and outsourcing for the PsPrint blog, just as for other visual computerization sites. Need to improve your English in a short time a day? Get a membership and begin getting our composing tips and activities day by day! Continue learning! Peruse the Freelance Writing class, check our famous posts, or pick a related post below:Grammar Test 115 Words for Household Rooms, and Their SynonymsEmpathic or Empathetic?

Life After Life ( Raymond Moody ) free essay sample

Inspects 15 normal phases of understanding of close passing phenomenon(NDE) This investigation will look at the fifteen various types of encounters portrayed by Raymond A. Cranky, Jr. in Life After Life: The Investigation of A PhenomenonSurvival of Bodily Death. These encounters are highlights of the perishing experience. Moodys book relies upon the records of people who have kicked the bucket and come back from that experience. Subsequently, it can't be viewed as a logical work. Ill humored concedes that a proof of these encounters are not directly conceivable (xvi). On the off chance that the peruser is to get anything out of the book, the person must open their heart and psyche to the chance of the brush with death. Grouchy needs to attempt to address the inquiry What is it like to bite the dust? (1). For such an answer, he goes to individuals who have had, or who guarantee to have had, an involvement with which they have genuinely kicked the bucket and returned to life. We will compose a custom paper test on Facing everyday life After Life ( Raymond Moody ) or on the other hand any comparable theme explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page They are the main ones..

Friday, August 21, 2020

The Arguments For And Against Globalization Economics Essay

The Arguments For And Against Globalization Economics Essay Globalization is a cutting edge wonder, which can be examined from different perspectives. Generally, we may state that globalization is joining of provincial economies, social orders and societies in a globe-spreading over system of correspondence and exchange. This term is a piece of a verifiable procedure of free enterprise which is another global request with regards to a solitary world. Globalization is now and then used to allude explicitly to financial globalization. This theme will be created along the article. Notwithstanding, as used to be communicated by the ex-secretary of the United Nations Brutos Gali, there is no just a single globalization, there are numerous globalizations such us mechanical, sociocultural, political, natural A case of that not just the financial globalization exists is the formation of the International Penal Court, since the human rights are beginning inclination the impacts of the globalization and it is important uniform and universalize the acknowledgment of the key privileges of the citizenship. Globalization additionally alludes to a procedure of communication among social orders and nearby societies in a worldwide culture to what we would call sociocultural globalization. Various definitions The word globalization is characterized by various creators, official organizations and word references as indicated by their perspective. Subsequently, there isn't just a single exact importance of this term all around acknowledged by everyone. From one viewpoint, United Nations (UN)Â [1]Â has characterized it as an occasion, unavoidable in our history. It makes one world through the trading of merchandise, items, data, information and culture. This is an aftereffect of the progression forward in the field of interchanges, transport, innovation and industry. As indicated by the World Bank Group (WBG)Â [2]Â , the most used significance for globalization is an intercontinental monetary action, which has expanded pointedly. In this movement they incorporate Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), International Commerce and Capital Flow. In any case, the International Monetary Fund (IMF)Â [3]Â has consolidated both the United Nations and the World Bank Groups definition. It likewise discusses globalization regarding FDI, Capital Flow, International Commerce and the astounding development of correspondence and innovation. Moreover, IMF determines that occasionally globalization makes it fundamental for the workforce and information to need to move to another nation. Be that as it may, these sorts of organizations are by all account not the only ones who need to give their own meaning of globalization. A wide scope of creators have offered their input on the point. For instance, David Dollarâ [4]â , in a meeting distributed in the World Bank Group Web, said that the monetary globalization, or as he would prefer to utilize, the financial mix happens when a nation decreases or disposes of the business boundaries, for example, custom obligation, and they acknowledge speculations and exchange from the remainder of the world. Notwithstanding, Leslie Sklairâ [5]â thinks that it ought to be viewed as another period of free enterprise, one that rises above the unit of the country state. His school, Anthony Giddensâ [6]â , doesn't think similarly as him. For this situation, he discusses globalization as a change in the worldwide market, the advancement in the correspondence and exchange between country states in physical items, data and cash. Development from two unique perspectives Theodore Levittâ [7]â was the maker of the word globalization. He utilized it for first time in quite a while book called The Globalization of Markets to depict the change of the universal economy which had been occurring since 1960. Be that as it may, its development isn't sufficiently clear. A few people say that it began in 1980s and others are supportive of 1870s. In any case, in either case, the bases of globalization are three explicit thoughts, as per the Washington Consensus: an extreme monetary framework, privatization and the unwinding of the limitations on economyâ [8]â . The World Bank Group discusses four stages in Globalizations advancement. While, Leandro Sã ¡nchez Zepeda, in his doctoral theory, clarifies that there are five unique stages. I need more information to conclude which is progressively fitting, so in the accompanying section I am going to give insights regarding the improvement of the two contemplations. As indicated by the WGBÂ [9]Â , these are the means: From 1870 to 1914: this period was portrayed by the progression forward in transport and the disposal of business obstructions. The measure of fares increased nearly 8% and 10% of the all out populace moved to another nation. From 1914 to 1950: the circumstance was as before 1870, set apart by protectionism. From 1950 to 1980: during those years, the procedure developed to a monetary mix between rich nations. In addition, Europe, North America and Japan opened their business sectors. From 1980 until 2009: in this time, producing expanded to 80% around the world. A few nations, for example, Brazil, India and Vietnam, improved their universal business and the globalization caused creating nations to improve. Then again, Leandro Sã ¡nchez Zepedaâ [10]â has set forward an alternate sentiment in his doctoral postulation: From 1870 to 1913: this period was set apart by a top in trade because of an expansion in capital and work power. From 1913 to 1950: because of the Great Depression, the First and the Second World War worldwide business diminished. From 1950 to 1973: on account of the Bretton Woods framework, worldwide mix was fortified. From 1973 to 1990: during these years the measure of open organizations which got private expanded, the monetary framework began to be increasingly open to the world, correspondence and transport progressed and it got worldwide. From 1991 until today: there are all the more organized commerce regions, for example, ALADI, NAFTA and ASEAN, and the monetary mix has gotten more grounded. As opposed to past periods, the workforce moves less and capital and data are crossing outskirts. GLOBALIZATION Globalization itself is a persistent and dynamic procedure that challenges the laws of the nations by they way they manage the activity of endeavors and financial conduct of people at the worldwide level, who can offer work to workforce jobless and furthermore advantage from outstanding inconsistencies and shortcomings in a specific nation. It is a perplexing wonder; along these lines it ought not shock us that it causes various responses in various people or gatherings. Some consider that compromises the system of the country state, national character and the advanced idea of majority rule government. For a few, it guarantees another time of wealth for all, for other people, it is the enticement of an industrialism that will bankrupt ethically and financially the larger part. For globalization Why monetary globalization is a decent framework? Advances in correspondence and transportation innovation, joined with free-advertise belief system, have given products, administrations and capital uncommon versatility. For instance, Northern nations need to open world markets to their products and exploit bottomless, modest work in the South. To do this, these nations utilize universal budgetary organizations, for example, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank Group, and territorial exchange agreementsâ [11]â to force poor nations to incorporate by decreasing taxes, privatizing state undertakings and loosening up natural and work guidelines. Globalization is a marvel that is imperative to the create of the economy in each nation, because of the general opening of business sectors for merchandise and capital proposes the finish of exchanging coalitions, provincial arrangements and monetary freedom of nations yet additionally encourages the capacity to settle financial requirements that nearby players have been not able to fulfill. It makes simple the trade between various nations and diminishes the contrast among created and immature nations. A few factors for globalization are: Worldwide economy and market, which can prompt a superior use of assets. More noteworthy capacity to move contrasted with changes in national economies. New chances of create markets. Utilizing economies of scale, it can diminish cost. Worldwide collaboration. Development and mergers between organizations. Privatization of open organizations. Worldwide money related deregulation. Advancement of methods for correspondence and transport. The free development of capital permits a progressively effective distribution of worldwide reserve funds and gives to rising economies the assets to create and advance the combination of a supported and adjusted development. Globalization opens up open doors for created economies to improve their proficiency and profitability and permits economies in creating to improve the expectations for everyday comforts of its populace. Against of globalization At the point when globalization was characterized, it attempted to limit the effect of negative focuses and fortify positive focuses. A few variables against globalization are: Absence of authority over business sectors and worldwide undertakings. Expanded financial social and regional lopsided characteristics. Convergence of lavishness and expanded social disparity. Non-satisfaction of least work guidelines. Full work, a need as of not long ago, was delayed. The work needs to act as a ware, subject to the laws of flexibly and request and the creation needs, without laws that protections smooth least rights. Harm to the earth. Danger to biodiversity and social legacy. Predominance of money related theoretical economy over genuine economy. Increment misuse of kid work Discussion The advancement of worldwide exchange implies increasingly financial development and government assistance, for example, the case of China, where outside capital has contributed vigorously and the nation has risen amazingly by the impact of globalization. Yet, on the off chance that we go to Africa, we can see that its kin ar

Thursday, July 30, 2020

Word of the Week! Etiology Richmond Writing

Word of the Week! Etiology Richmond Writing Many thanks to our commenter Betty Ann Dillon, last week. She taught me a new word.   This term is given by the OED Online in our spelling, as well as aetiology, a tip to its  classical Latin origin,  aetiologia, and before that, Greek. Simply put, etiology is the cause or reason for something. A starting point, like the sign above. Our word might appear in medical works about the cause of a disease, or in philosophy as the study of causes. This term merits tagging both for style and legal writing. Why not say origin? The answer is variety.   Our word adds sophistication (and can save you verbiage) when used with a knowing audience, raising the formal register of the sentence. Joseph Glaser advises this in  Understanding Style, though it can be overdone. As we consider how much is too much, we might wish to mull over the advice of Richard C. Wydick, whose book  Plain English for Lawyers caught my eye recently. Wydick advises against too much Latin by attorneys, as well as lawyerisms such as said term instead of that word, since Sometimes [lawyers] do it out of habit or haste; the old phrase is the one they learned in law school, and they have never taken time to question its use (59). Is this weeks word too much? As I teach my students, the answer depends upon ones audience. Jargon and latinate terms can save time among the right people; for the wrong audience, they alienate. Over time, a speaker or writer develops a unique voice; that is something I cannot teach. I or other writing teachers can, however, impart lessons about style, audience, and purpose.   Words like the one given help to keep us in the game. Theres nuance in every slightly different synonym. Do you have a word or metaphor worth pondering? This blog will continue all summer.  Please nominate a word or metaphor useful in academic writing by e-mailing me (jessid -at- richmond -dot- edu) or leaving a comment below. See all of our Metaphors of the Month  here  and Words of the Week  here. Image Starting Point, courtesy of faoch at Flikr. Looks to be in Fort William, Scotland. I walked the Great Glen Way in 2014, so its near to my heart! Work Cited Wydick, Richard C.  Plain English for Lawyers. 5th ed., Carolina Academic Press, 2005.

Monday, June 29, 2020

Conquering Right Triangles the Pythagorean Theorem on ACT Math †Part 1

The ACT Math Test loves triangles! Out of all the ACT math topics tested, the triangle is the most commonly tested Geometric shape. The Pythagorean Theorem and the properties of right triangles are especially tested. The Pythagorean Theorem is a formula used to find the third side of a right triangle if you know the other two sides. Remember, it only works for a right triangle (a triangle with a 90-degree angle). The Pythagorean Theorem can be represented as  in which a and b are the two shorter sides and c is the hypotenuse (the name given to the side across from the 90-degree angle).   To save time on the ACT Math Test, it helps to memorize and recognize the common Pythagorean triplets. These are common ratios between the sides that come up often in right triangles. The most common are 3:4:5 and 5:12:13. These ratios will also be true for any multiples of 3:4:5 and 5:12:13 such as 6:8:10 or 10:24:26. For example, if you are told a right triangle has a hypotenuse of 10 and one side with a length of 6, you can tell that the third side is 8. That’s because it must fit a 6:x:10 ratio, which if we divide by two   becomes 3:(x/2):5. This looks a lot like 3:4:5, so x/2 = 4, and x = 8. Definitely a good time-saver! There are also two right triangles that are very important to know called the special right triangles. These are so called because the ratio of their sides never changes. The first is a 30-60-90 triangle. Its sides will always be in a ratio of x: x√3 : 2x. The other special triangle is the 45-45-90 triangle. Its sides will always be in a ratio of x: x: x√2. It’s important to remember that for the 30-60-90 triangle, the hypotenuse is the side that has the ratio of 2x. Don’t confuse it with the 45-45-90 ratio, and think that the x√3 should be there! Here’s   great question that illustrates how knowing these special right triangle ratios can be invaluable: Which of the following sets of three numbers could be the side lengths, in yards, of a right triangle containing a 45 ° angle? Here, even if we forgot the 45-45-90 ratios, we can eliminate any choice that doesnt meet the Pythagorean theorem, since the question tells us we’re dealing with a right triangle. To choose between (C), (D), and (E), notice that a right triangle with one 45 degree angle must have another 45 degree angle. 180 90 45 = 45. This means that the triangle is isosceles, and the correct answer choice must contain two equal values. The correct answer is (C).

Friday, May 22, 2020

The Gabriel Garcia Marquez s The Handsomest Drowned Man

In â€Å"The Handsomest Drowned Man in the World,† a remotely isolated village with a small population is suddenly turned upside down when the corpse of a giant stranger washes up on their small shore. This villager is clearly not from the same world the villagers live in, and as they wonder where he came from, they begin to create stories about his life and who he is. They give him a name, Esteban, and create a world of fiction through which they can glimpse what his life was like for him, regardless of the truth. As they prepare to give Esteban a proper funeral procedure according to their own cultural practices, they create stories about him and honor him, even though they have no idea who he really is. The lines between reality and illusion in Gabriel Garcia Marquez’s short story â€Å"The Handsomest Drowned Man in the World† are blurred in many ways, especially regarding the cultural conflict, concept of death, and ideological conflict of the villagers. Marq uez is known for his perceptions realism and his perceptions about realism and illusions (Dauster 467). This form of realism that has been directly associated with him has been called â€Å"magic† realism (Rabassa 449). In all Marquez’s short stories there are connections to illusion and realism and they all have this same type of connection to one another that causes a sense of chaos and mystery (Dauster 467). In this particular story, the characters all experience the concept of the eye of the beholder, through which everyoneShow MoreRelatedThe Handsomest Drowned Man In The World Essay1207 Words   |  5 Pagesnature. Some manifest as small changes, summer to fall, ice to water; others a grand metamorphosis. Humans the center of this cycle, find themselves changing every day, biologically, developmentally, ideologically, etcetera. Gabriel Garcia Marquez’s â€Å"The Handsomest Drowned Man In The World,† and Carson McCuller’s â€Å"Sucker† are both excellent examples of short stories that, despite having undeniably different plots, feature the overarching theme of transformation: the propellant through life. Transitions